Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 19:10:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FA4E2392CA2F7C3AC9920E8852F895488FD2B08D0B8C8D28320F3B6011EA981
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fake account, and does not post on behalf of the New Yorker

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687093839444738048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FA4E2392CA2F7C3AC9920E8852F895488FD2B08D0B8C8D28320F3B6011EA981
  • createdAtMillis - 1691089811270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16870938394447380482FA4E2392CA2F7C3AC9920E8852F895488FD2B08D0B8C8D28320F3B6011EA981