Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 01:01:07 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5218B950F1D3466AD0C6E1D4B565E4F8EB67FB0447319023F1AF8959DBA5C56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il a été prouvé que cette étude est fausse, les chercheurs ne se sont basées sur aucune donnée concrète. https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2014/09/25/97001-20140925FILWWW00224-un-francais-accuse-d-avoir-falsifie-des-donnees.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686852227510456320
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5218B950F1D3466AD0C6E1D4B565E4F8EB67FB0447319023F1AF8959DBA5C56
  • createdAtMillis - 1691197267143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686852227510456320C5218B950F1D3466AD0C6E1D4B565E4F8EB67FB0447319023F1AF8959DBA5C56