Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 09:41:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A25FEF0841498F1A3CC8B57899F9FF8A583D51EE744A89C6C692E586F8A2A106
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apenas para adicionar mais contexto ao tweet errôneo e já corrigido da jornalista, a Suprema Corte sul-africana decidiu que a reprodução da canção não constitui discurso de ódio. https://youtube.com/watch?v=6tNWa_4DVWs&feature=share7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686830815454396416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A25FEF0841498F1A3CC8B57899F9FF8A583D51EE744A89C6C692E586F8A2A106
  • createdAtMillis - 1691055675606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686830815454396416A25FEF0841498F1A3CC8B57899F9FF8A583D51EE744A89C6C692E586F8A2A106