Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-02 12:15:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23
Participant Details

Original Note:

ツイートの主張の反例として,「風評加害者」という言葉を環境省が使用している例を挙げておきます. ■伝わる表現力を試してみませんか ~風評加害者とならないために~ https://www.env.go.jp/press/press_00508.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686568939776811008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23
  • createdAtMillis - 1690978544647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686568939776811008FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23