Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-02 10:59:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0A21BA2CC1927B1CFCDDD2B6A6AAB5A6DFA8B062D7C497F35B2F2827E95A3D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A statement that studies are flawed cannot be refuted by referring to the allegedly flawed studies. That's like arguing that Trump won the election and when someone disagrees you say, "but Trump said so."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686435809233162255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0A21BA2CC1927B1CFCDDD2B6A6AAB5A6DFA8B062D7C497F35B2F2827E95A3D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1690973962355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1686435809233162255D0A21BA2CC1927B1CFCDDD2B6A6AAB5A6DFA8B062D7C497F35B2F2827E95A3D9