Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 14:13:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98E2B39F92B9239C5C9D14658E768393190E4D2E3DB71668D3001F870B88A493
Participant Details

Original Note:

A statement that studies are flawed cannot be refuted by referring to the allegedly flawed studies. That's like arguing that Trump won the election and when someone disagrees you say, "but Trump said so."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686435809233162255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98E2B39F92B9239C5C9D14658E768393190E4D2E3DB71668D3001F870B88A493
  • createdAtMillis - 1723472007295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168643580923316225598E2B39F92B9239C5C9D14658E768393190E4D2E3DB71668D3001F870B88A493