Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 15:38:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE8A4E0C0C071CC11CCFFA5A4F6E6AA07190B715C30F7B5CDB8AF3371C009B15
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- The first note uses a very biased source to claim that the birth defect of intersex is 1. Far more prominent than it is, and 2. Should be conflated with the lgbt movement. As a gay, I find this inaccurate and distasteful but it's always the same old (incorrect) argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686335947711946752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE8A4E0C0C071CC11CCFFA5A4F6E6AA07190B715C30F7B5CDB8AF3371C009B15
  • createdAtMillis - 1690904282900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686335947711946752CE8A4E0C0C071CC11CCFFA5A4F6E6AA07190B715C30F7B5CDB8AF3371C009B15