Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 23:07:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F6EA171E5421C994FF4911AB512C63C068A241AF75896E849E58E18EE500710
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- The first note uses a very biased source to claim that the birth defect of intersex is 1. Far more prominent than it is, and 2. Should be conflated with the lgbt movement. As a gay, I find this inaccurate and distasteful but it's always the same old (incorrect) argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686335947711946752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F6EA171E5421C994FF4911AB512C63C068A241AF75896E849E58E18EE500710
  • createdAtMillis - 1691104036582
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16863359477119467523F6EA171E5421C994FF4911AB512C63C068A241AF75896E849E58E18EE500710