Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 06:13:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6B7E135E2A61A51B374BBF1A081D9CFB3B9D768519624A9EA86D6AC7C80A263
Participant Details

Original Note:

Brandwatch made X aware that the CCDH gained access to X's data without Brandwatch’s authorization, and that the purported CCDH "research" cited in a Bloomberg article “contained metrics used out of context to make unsubstantiated assertions about X (formerly Twitter).” https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2023/a-new-era-of-transparency-for-twitter1 https://twitter.com/X/status/1686220344040828928

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686225982796054528
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6B7E135E2A61A51B374BBF1A081D9CFB3B9D768519624A9EA86D6AC7C80A263
  • createdAtMillis - 1690870423277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686225982796054528A6B7E135E2A61A51B374BBF1A081D9CFB3B9D768519624A9EA86D6AC7C80A263