Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 17:28:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEF32014C55FFFEA11960BF93249A8E6F0721F481154C799A10CB8CA162E35A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The courts already had little tolerance for this kind of unlawful protest. In this case, the appellants were on bail while offending - and had committed previous offences. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/R-v-Trowland-judgment-310723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686076726235840528
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEF32014C55FFFEA11960BF93249A8E6F0721F481154C799A10CB8CA162E35A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1690910919639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1686076726235840528BEF32014C55FFFEA11960BF93249A8E6F0721F481154C799A10CB8CA162E35A0