Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 14:13:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94E399D18C99E2F05C6BB750E7716CA99D4FD732AF298C87CBF64CB334AF6059
Participant Details

Original Note:

The courts already had little tolerance for this kind of unlawful protest. In this case, the appellants were on bail while offending - and had committed previous offences. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/R-v-Trowland-judgment-310723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686076726235840528
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94E399D18C99E2F05C6BB750E7716CA99D4FD732AF298C87CBF64CB334AF6059
  • createdAtMillis - 1690899221992
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168607672623584052894E399D18C99E2F05C6BB750E7716CA99D4FD732AF298C87CBF64CB334AF6059