Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 21:50:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DE70BAE69B3EB3B0281D83AAFEE3D7AE7FD8F34687FF8AF50125DDE8EFD0E5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is conjecture presented as fact with no proof. https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1685880467264819200?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1686066775052468257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DE70BAE69B3EB3B0281D83AAFEE3D7AE7FD8F34687FF8AF50125DDE8EFD0E5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1690840218435
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16860667750524682572DE70BAE69B3EB3B0281D83AAFEE3D7AE7FD8F34687FF8AF50125DDE8EFD0E5B