Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-10 22:04:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB85CEF04A786D037187C5E57ED873301BEC5D9DACFA1CBC200203F5C8C005A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study is still just on the preprint server, which means it’s hasn’t been reviewed by a review board. Until the science inside the paper has been approved for publication, one should be careful about drawing any meaningful conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685975867615219712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB85CEF04A786D037187C5E57ED873301BEC5D9DACFA1CBC200203F5C8C005A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1694383457699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685975867615219712EB85CEF04A786D037187C5E57ED873301BEC5D9DACFA1CBC200203F5C8C005A2