Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 14:43:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D260CBBE466BDF85B3DCD2CBA583194E0B00EE40E8EBFE63D370E02DB603ECDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study is still just on the preprint server, which means it’s hasn’t been reviewed by a review board. Until the science inside the paper has been approved for publication, one should be careful about drawing any meaningful conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685975867615219712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D260CBBE466BDF85B3DCD2CBA583194E0B00EE40E8EBFE63D370E02DB603ECDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1690814620639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1685975867615219712D260CBBE466BDF85B3DCD2CBA583194E0B00EE40E8EBFE63D370E02DB603ECDA