Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 21:30:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note suggests there is "no evidence"; firsthand testimony *is* evidence there's two examples in the article The source quoted doesn't reference the porn stars' FB pages, it's about Dan's alleged use of pseudonym - which the Byline Article mentions as a separate subject

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685952595754442753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611
  • createdAtMillis - 1690925401204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685952595754442753D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611