Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 13:41:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A05716112F97DB6AA0F53FF951F526C94A556376BB6F08234C8EC112E208137C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note suggests there is "no evidence"; firsthand testimony *is* evidence there's two examples in the article The source quoted doesn't reference the porn stars' FB pages, it's about Dan's alleged use of pseudonym - which the Byline Article mentions as a separate subject

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685952595754442753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A05716112F97DB6AA0F53FF951F526C94A556376BB6F08234C8EC112E208137C
  • createdAtMillis - 1690810873569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685952595754442753A05716112F97DB6AA0F53FF951F526C94A556376BB6F08234C8EC112E208137C