Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 13:54:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CB8A0359B83A831EDE9A38FFE0E3E5ED73D1677A50374D2E1619F1450E2E77A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst the court ruled the 'song' is not hate speech, it is currently in appeals. Besides this point, this 'song' has caused countless murders on innocent 'white farmers' as they were incited by the singing of this 'song'. Hence it can still be seen as dangerous regardless.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685919300865957888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CB8A0359B83A831EDE9A38FFE0E3E5ED73D1677A50374D2E1619F1450E2E77A
  • createdAtMillis - 1690811669603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16859193008659578889CB8A0359B83A831EDE9A38FFE0E3E5ED73D1677A50374D2E1619F1450E2E77A