Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 08:05:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D4AED12CE13C1FCD8E82F304E019A3DE2EC2CB33F93CE09F4498289A22BA4F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ataque pessoal. Ou em termos metodológicos: argumento ad hominem. Além de condescendente, já que todos nós "somos mal formados" exceto o autor do post, que tem uma formação superior à nossa ao ponto de determinar a relevância do trabalho alheio.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685815800349720576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D4AED12CE13C1FCD8E82F304E019A3DE2EC2CB33F93CE09F4498289A22BA4F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1690790702290
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16858158003497205764D4AED12CE13C1FCD8E82F304E019A3DE2EC2CB33F93CE09F4498289A22BA4F1