Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 18:52:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27CEF2A737FA1FA7F2D4F8182B397C6B4F2876A44F847AD4C6CBC3CE3B584657
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ataque pessoal. Ou em termos metodológicos: argumento ad hominem. Além de condescendente, já que todos nós "somos mal formados" exceto o autor do post, que tem uma formação superior à nossa ao ponto de determinar a relevância do trabalho alheio.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685815800349720576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27CEF2A737FA1FA7F2D4F8182B397C6B4F2876A44F847AD4C6CBC3CE3B584657
  • createdAtMillis - 1690829556684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168581580034972057627CEF2A737FA1FA7F2D4F8182B397C6B4F2876A44F847AD4C6CBC3CE3B584657