Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 14:29:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7FAFEF32823E8348E06CBB41D7C1EA9957F22C51B658375234FAB6AA026BF9F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Given the delicate subject and how polarized the opinions are, the only way to be sure that the implications are true are at a minimum that the required hashtag appear later that the dm in question, and ideally a proof of payment. As it is, I would rate it improbable. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/date/2023-07-28/weekly/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685518859413929984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7FAFEF32823E8348E06CBB41D7C1EA9957F22C51B658375234FAB6AA026BF9F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1690727367228
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16855188594139299847FAFEF32823E8348E06CBB41D7C1EA9957F22C51B658375234FAB6AA026BF9F4