Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 14:11:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69A6C09F9A6A010BD41F6B8C72EDC71EDD8399F960E70E92CC032DFC8CDCD4B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Given the delicate subject and how polarized the opinions are, the only way to be sure that the implications are true are at a minimum that the required hashtag appear later that the dm in question, and ideally a proof of payment. As it is, I would rate it improbable. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/date/2023-07-28/weekly/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685518859413929984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69A6C09F9A6A010BD41F6B8C72EDC71EDD8399F960E70E92CC032DFC8CDCD4B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1690726263037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 168551885941392998469A6C09F9A6A010BD41F6B8C72EDC71EDD8399F960E70E92CC032DFC8CDCD4B6