Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 22:03:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 021ACFD0DE1DC4C26EB4E2F045A0A231330AAA441064923FA6FB9667E49CEAE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

A publicação cita apenas o contexto sob a ótica da patrocinadora, não cita por exemplo que a empresa era bem irrelevante no cenário nacional e após a associação ao clube se tornou uma potência, a mesma coisa em relação a faculdade que era inexpressiva.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685405348574695424
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 021ACFD0DE1DC4C26EB4E2F045A0A231330AAA441064923FA6FB9667E49CEAE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1690668194443
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685405348574695424021ACFD0DE1DC4C26EB4E2F045A0A231330AAA441064923FA6FB9667E49CEAE0