Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 17:15:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4E1094B4FB2C5BA5D0882AF77E1AC042DBD94617AD58516F3BB0A957BEF1D9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es konnte (bisher) nicht sicher geklärt werden, was die Ursache des Brandes ist. Beide Artikel (Originaltweet und Note) beschreiben diese Ungewissheit. Der Tweet-Autor äußert seine Meinung und es ist keine bewiesene Falschinformation enthalten.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685394321212678146
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4E1094B4FB2C5BA5D0882AF77E1AC042DBD94617AD58516F3BB0A957BEF1D9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1690737339467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685394321212678146D4E1094B4FB2C5BA5D0882AF77E1AC042DBD94617AD58516F3BB0A957BEF1D9F