Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 21:56:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5AF2302418731348CA621824A76F5AE991D7A1FC03E2D3FC123B3C1868F0882
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet proposes a subjective interpretation of a scientific work, and can be traced back to the fallacy of the ad verecundiam argument. https://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/authority.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685261424640106496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5AF2302418731348CA621824A76F5AE991D7A1FC03E2D3FC123B3C1868F0882
  • createdAtMillis - 1690667788915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685261424640106496F5AF2302418731348CA621824A76F5AE991D7A1FC03E2D3FC123B3C1868F0882