Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 12:41:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8C5C6CCFE655D100D0451CA71C0503740D662CD9CB140A305675A95EECBB7D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet proposes a subjective interpretation of a scientific work, and can be traced back to the fallacy of the ad verecundiam argument. https://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/authority.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685261424640106496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8C5C6CCFE655D100D0451CA71C0503740D662CD9CB140A305675A95EECBB7D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1690634463431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1685261424640106496A8C5C6CCFE655D100D0451CA71C0503740D662CD9CB140A305675A95EECBB7D8