Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 22:35:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet proposes a subjective interpretation of a scientific work, and can be traced back to the fallacy of the ad verecundiam argument. https://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/authority.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685261424640106496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
  • createdAtMillis - 1690929356956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16852614246401064962535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857