Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 23:31:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60A1A5B2BAFDBFD1CF53DA67DC4AA43E7A2E5EFAF221299049287AC6E8E645EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Readers if this post should consider these points: 1- The author of the post has not cited the image or the claims he is making. 2- The data presented is not clear and readers cannot easily understand the scope of the data. 3- The lack of context makes the post baised

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685252825880698881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60A1A5B2BAFDBFD1CF53DA67DC4AA43E7A2E5EFAF221299049287AC6E8E645EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1690673508633
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 168525282588069888160A1A5B2BAFDBFD1CF53DA67DC4AA43E7A2E5EFAF221299049287AC6E8E645EE