Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 06:38:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 245F352E95F9ECB0AFDFD7EF451A5E7F82F9A309EC31889F5A525CCE4C473BD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not only is this an opinion but the proposed note seems to back up the opinion citing a “lack of interest in a wider release”. Surely that context only strengthens the claim that the project wasn’t successful? NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685065687188885504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 245F352E95F9ECB0AFDFD7EF451A5E7F82F9A309EC31889F5A525CCE4C473BD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1690612680844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685065687188885504245F352E95F9ECB0AFDFD7EF451A5E7F82F9A309EC31889F5A525CCE4C473BD9