Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-01 11:48:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E21ADE109B1F9D21D1E20AE72D1D9904EB904402652B183FBA5DE863A987F16D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is missing context, and might mislead people into thinking solar is a net negative for the environment. Even if solar is on the high end of emissions, it's 2-3x less carbon intensive than fossil gas. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf (pdf pg 7)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684984245557895169
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E21ADE109B1F9D21D1E20AE72D1D9904EB904402652B183FBA5DE863A987F16D
  • createdAtMillis - 1690890531247
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684984245557895169E21ADE109B1F9D21D1E20AE72D1D9904EB904402652B183FBA5DE863A987F16D