Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 12:12:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DDFFA833E9017C637D9396CABA0AE62BB96C8E10F21146400CA5C55D8DF3F62
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note itself is argumentative and driven by fallacies. Straw man: ESA report values were not mentioned falsum in uno falsum in omnibus: only one example is addressed Fallacy fallacy: just because the tweet is allegedly a hyperbole, it doesn't mean the content is false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684879485101871105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DDFFA833E9017C637D9396CABA0AE62BB96C8E10F21146400CA5C55D8DF3F62
  • createdAtMillis - 1690632735621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16848794851018711053DDFFA833E9017C637D9396CABA0AE62BB96C8E10F21146400CA5C55D8DF3F62