Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 11:02:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DDB4C6F88BE5F471C83A3995025C43B6550064E628ED59070F776BAFBB17974
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note itself is argumentative and driven by fallacies. Straw man: ESA report values were not mentioned falsum in uno falsum in omnibus: only one example is addressed Fallacy fallacy: just because the tweet is allegedly a hyperbole, it doesn't mean the content is false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684879485101871105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DDB4C6F88BE5F471C83A3995025C43B6550064E628ED59070F776BAFBB17974
  • createdAtMillis - 1690542145301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16848794851018711052DDB4C6F88BE5F471C83A3995025C43B6550064E628ED59070F776BAFBB17974