Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 08:35:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D84DC2E31480F942126FFADD8D0DA83A7C0CAA403FA9F5099AA19BDBF5E4A1ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tuomio perustui nimenomaan yksityisten asioiden (seksielämä) kuvausten jakamiseen, ei yhteiskunnallisesti merkittävien mielipiteiden julkaisuun. https://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-2000002702276.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684800099933630464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D84DC2E31480F942126FFADD8D0DA83A7C0CAA403FA9F5099AA19BDBF5E4A1ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1690533303822
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684800099933630464D84DC2E31480F942126FFADD8D0DA83A7C0CAA403FA9F5099AA19BDBF5E4A1ED