Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 09:43:48 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04DDF902C0514BB9463B623BB65DA60DAC511381942C2E9CE0F97EED3CC2CA1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tuomio perustui nimenomaan yksityisten asioiden (seksielämä) kuvausten jakamiseen, ei yhteiskunnallisesti merkittävien mielipiteiden julkaisuun. https://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-2000002702276.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684800099933630464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04DDF902C0514BB9463B623BB65DA60DAC511381942C2E9CE0F97EED3CC2CA1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1690537428931
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168480009993363046404DDF902C0514BB9463B623BB65DA60DAC511381942C2E9CE0F97EED3CC2CA1D