Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 00:28:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA4A66B56BD3C3CE3516B5AF24F6220AA2C5B7BA0BE93CD3F4DA23C73C20BEB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet does supply a lot of sources and references, the evidence is too often selective and/or anecdotal. The arguments raised, can thus neither be verified nor wholly discarded. It remains speculative in nature.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684654703227899904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA4A66B56BD3C3CE3516B5AF24F6220AA2C5B7BA0BE93CD3F4DA23C73C20BEB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1690676911952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684654703227899904CA4A66B56BD3C3CE3516B5AF24F6220AA2C5B7BA0BE93CD3F4DA23C73C20BEB6