Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 21:45:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet does supply a lot of sources and references, the evidence is too often selective and/or anecdotal. The arguments raised, can thus neither be verified nor wholly discarded. It remains speculative in nature.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684654703227899904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD
  • createdAtMillis - 1690494335145
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684654703227899904C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD