Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 22:31:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet does supply a lot of sources and references, the evidence is too often selective and/or anecdotal. The arguments raised, can thus neither be verified nor wholly discarded. It remains speculative in nature.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684654703227899904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1690497087568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684654703227899904AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0