Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 17:32:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 973AB10A2AFB1ECAD4E8FE26B5297A2B862B03B71932F7C63402B56C3EC0C6D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is correct. Besides, the article linked to, does not show us which regulation in the fencing rules has been broken exactly, it just recites what happened. The article does not refer to a specific rulebook or paragraph in such rulebook. Kind regards.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684597352248561665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 973AB10A2AFB1ECAD4E8FE26B5297A2B862B03B71932F7C63402B56C3EC0C6D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1690479172731
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684597352248561665973AB10A2AFB1ECAD4E8FE26B5297A2B862B03B71932F7C63402B56C3EC0C6D4