Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 17:09:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B645092C34EC3A3ECDBB9FE2E8C99F7C5E927F1A8F2F0F66923D29318CE835E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is correct. Besides, the article linked to, does not show us which regulation in the fencing rules has been broken exactly, it just recites what happened. The article does not refer to a specific rulebook or paragraph in such rulebook. Kind regards.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684597352248561665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B645092C34EC3A3ECDBB9FE2E8C99F7C5E927F1A8F2F0F66923D29318CE835E
  • createdAtMillis - 1690477785080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16845973522485616656B645092C34EC3A3ECDBB9FE2E8C99F7C5E927F1A8F2F0F66923D29318CE835E