Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 06:31:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50B14E2B999936168A233AFE7E1C7F36A85C63388E74E248D681CD438DDFE07D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is correct. Besides, the article linked to, does not show us which regulation in the fencing rules has been broken exactly, it just recites what happened. The article does not refer to a specific rulebook or paragraph in such rulebook. Kind regards.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684597352248561665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 50B14E2B999936168A233AFE7E1C7F36A85C63388E74E248D681CD438DDFE07D
  • createdAtMillis - 1690525873384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168459735224856166550B14E2B999936168A233AFE7E1C7F36A85C63388E74E248D681CD438DDFE07D