Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 17:40:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B58F729489F9A27D0C38E3B2C33D3F42780F3A9E1B7A5D9B23AB217916D2F5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is correct. Besides, the article linked to, does not show us which regulation in the fencing rules has been broken exactly, it just recites what happened. The article does not refer to a specific rulebook or paragraph in such rulebook. Kind regards.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684597352248561665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B58F729489F9A27D0C38E3B2C33D3F42780F3A9E1B7A5D9B23AB217916D2F5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1690479638117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16845973522485616654B58F729489F9A27D0C38E3B2C33D3F42780F3A9E1B7A5D9B23AB217916D2F5D