Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 20:02:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BA69D271FA11AB18A61C47E5EC52C2E2B21153076CB8089C14F02BF06BD2EC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post followed the images, describing their content was viewed over 300,000 times according to Tweet Analytics. Furthermore many accounts responded directly to the now deleted tweet stating it did not belong on twitter and commented. https://twitter.com/faineg/status/1684333893753634816 https://twitter.com/faineg/status/1684340890821701634

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684578587498942470
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BA69D271FA11AB18A61C47E5EC52C2E2B21153076CB8089C14F02BF06BD2EC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1690574563581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16845785874989424706BA69D271FA11AB18A61C47E5EC52C2E2B21153076CB8089C14F02BF06BD2EC5