Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 16:02:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01A6B2AF253DAC894EE00E91AA77FB52E36496E9FE879859547725799BE57314
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post followed the images, describing their content was viewed over 300,000 times according to Tweet Analytics. Furthermore many accounts responded directly to the now deleted tweet stating it did not belong on twitter and commented. https://twitter.com/faineg/status/1684333893753634816 https://twitter.com/faineg/status/1684340890821701634

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684578587498942470
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01A6B2AF253DAC894EE00E91AA77FB52E36496E9FE879859547725799BE57314
  • createdAtMillis - 1690473737763
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168457858749894247001A6B2AF253DAC894EE00E91AA77FB52E36496E9FE879859547725799BE57314