Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 22:25:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0CD6653E0AA054D97C620B1C02AD3F1D1F1A251D6082FE5F58E09200E7FD44D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le tweet évoque une affaire judiciaire en cours. Les journalistes écrivent donc au conditionnel parce que la justice n'a pas encore donné de verdict.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684501749904687104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0CD6653E0AA054D97C620B1C02AD3F1D1F1A251D6082FE5F58E09200E7FD44D
  • createdAtMillis - 1690496722554
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684501749904687104A0CD6653E0AA054D97C620B1C02AD3F1D1F1A251D6082FE5F58E09200E7FD44D