Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 07:01:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0733C915D86C4FE97FF59D13017A45F229E29F38FAD1AAA0B9A9FD39F846FD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Begriff "vernichtendes Urteil" suggeriert dem Leser, dass der Erfolg der Methode nicht vorhanden ist. Eigentlich sagt der Review nur, dass es keine ausreichende Studienlage gibt.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684455048732983296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0733C915D86C4FE97FF59D13017A45F229E29F38FAD1AAA0B9A9FD39F846FD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1690441266811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684455048732983296B0733C915D86C4FE97FF59D13017A45F229E29F38FAD1AAA0B9A9FD39F846FD9