Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 12:27:05 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D289C9B4ED16F75BD22A81C61EC3DC9B13CC6FE19319B4B2FE30F4F13C7F2AC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “discovery” mentioned is under huge suspicion as the scientists involved have engaged in publishing a prior paper with falsified data, & plagiarism. https://twitter.com/just4thenews/status/1684407684504625153?s=46&t=hP7Nz3c96C4DmkST13Ufag

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684429907206742018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D289C9B4ED16F75BD22A81C61EC3DC9B13CC6FE19319B4B2FE30F4F13C7F2AC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1690720025319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684429907206742018D289C9B4ED16F75BD22A81C61EC3DC9B13CC6FE19319B4B2FE30F4F13C7F2AC6