Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 08:10:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F5E53E74456AB58E7B17AF034D591C095B857A5E6085CBD076675E22A33A05F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “discovery” mentioned is under huge suspicion as the scientists involved have engaged in publishing a prior paper with falsified data, & plagiarism. https://twitter.com/just4thenews/status/1684407684504625153?s=46&t=hP7Nz3c96C4DmkST13Ufag

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684429907206742018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F5E53E74456AB58E7B17AF034D591C095B857A5E6085CBD076675E22A33A05F
  • createdAtMillis - 1690445413538
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16844299072067420182F5E53E74456AB58E7B17AF034D591C095B857A5E6085CBD076675E22A33A05F