Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 08:16:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F65C1F96239346DDA97641469451A8FED60E9EE1F2174457E2E48229B41CA53
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “discovery” mentioned is under huge suspicion as the scientists involved have engaged in publishing a prior paper with falsified data, & plagiarism. https://twitter.com/just4thenews/status/1684407684504625153?s=46&t=hP7Nz3c96C4DmkST13Ufag

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684429907206742018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F65C1F96239346DDA97641469451A8FED60E9EE1F2174457E2E48229B41CA53
  • createdAtMillis - 1690705014844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16844299072067420180F65C1F96239346DDA97641469451A8FED60E9EE1F2174457E2E48229B41CA53