Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 04:49:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E35F87C4E1E7692FA134F1471A735AE05F06E4111B1966DFC2FBE3BA6979534
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific explanation to justify the assertion made by the tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684401996894285824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E35F87C4E1E7692FA134F1471A735AE05F06E4111B1966DFC2FBE3BA6979534
  • createdAtMillis - 1690433375034
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16844019968942858246E35F87C4E1E7692FA134F1471A735AE05F06E4111B1966DFC2FBE3BA6979534