Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-27 15:22:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DCD3A2D0804C35FF818850D33353136E15F6EE88A229914C59363D726781569
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Tweet is factually correct and provides link to the study in comment section. No qualifying claim is made. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.2978

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684306180988870656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DCD3A2D0804C35FF818850D33353136E15F6EE88A229914C59363D726781569
  • createdAtMillis - 1690471327835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16843061809888706567DCD3A2D0804C35FF818850D33353136E15F6EE88A229914C59363D726781569