Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-26 15:21:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

2014年の最高裁判決では、「生活保護法が永住外国人に適用されると理解すべき根拠が見当たらない」とする一方で、「行政措置によって事実上の保護対象となり得るにとどまる」とし、外国人への生活保護を違憲や違法としていない。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASDG18H11_Y4A710C1CR8000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684209520837263369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1690384907587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684209520837263369FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C